Elite Brands Inc DS100M-C
Elite Brands Inc
32 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Macro
Budget
Street
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Elite Brands Inc DS100M-C | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | macro | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 100 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 100 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 15 | 13 |
| Groups | 12 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 1 | 3★ |
| Coating | Ultra Multi-Coating | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | T32 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | T3.1 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | Nikon Z |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.73 kg | 0.45 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | Stepping Motor★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 305 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:1 | 1:5.26 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Elite Brands Inc DS100M-C
- Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong optical (75th percentile)
- Strong macro (69th percentile)
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average bokeh (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
Preise
Elite Brands Inc DS100M-C0.072Score pro Dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.086Score pro Dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 bietet 1.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
