Zeiss Touit 32mm f/1.8 32mm
Zeiss
47 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Tamron
99 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Video Cinema
Budget
Professional
Macro
Portrait
Landscape
Travel
Street
Wildlife Sports
Spezifikationen
| Zeiss Touit 32mm f/1.8 32mm | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 32 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 32 mm | 70 mm |
| Elements | 8 | 16 |
| Groups | 5 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | T* anti-reflective coating | Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Sony E |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.21 kg★ | 0.54 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | autofocus | RXD |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:4.8★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Zeiss Touit 32mm f/1.8 32mm
- Strong bokeh (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong aperture (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
Preise
Zeiss Touit 32mm f/1.8 32mm0.076Score pro Dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD0.167Score pro Dollar
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD bietet 2.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Scores 99 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
