Kase 200mm f/5.6 MC Reflex Mirror 200mm
Kase
41 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Kase 200mm f/5.6 MC Reflex Mirror 200mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 200 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 6 | 13 |
| Groups | 5 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | Multicoated Optical Glass | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Nikon Z |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.38 kg★ | 0.45 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | Stepping Motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 2.00 m | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:9.09 | 1:5.26 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Kase 200mm f/5.6 MC Reflex Mirror 200mm
- Strong build (67th percentile)
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
Preise
Kase 200mm f/5.6 MC Reflex Mirror 200mm0.117Score pro Dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.090Score pro Dollar
Kase 200mm f/5.6 MC Reflex Mirror 200mm bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
