Canon RF14-35mm F4L IS USM 14-35mm
Canon
77 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Sony
89 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Travel
Budget
Street
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Portrait
Macro
Spezifikationen
| Canon RF14-35mm F4L IS USM 14-35mm | Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 14 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | 16 | 9 |
| Groups | 12 | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 4★ |
| ED Elements | 3★ | 1 |
| Coating | SWC and ASC | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/4 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.54 kg | 0.11 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 41 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Nano USM★ | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5.5 stops★ | 4 stops |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 201 mm★ | 250 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.38x★ | 0.215x |
Vor- & Nachteile
Canon RF14-35mm F4L IS USM 14-35mm
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
Preise
Canon RF14-35mm F4L IS USM 14-35mm0.059Score pro Dollar
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.255Score pro Dollar
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS bietet 4.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Scores 89 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 22 specs.
