Meike 35095 m43 35mm
Meike
44 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm
Fujifilm
79 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Macro
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Street
Budget
Landscape
Travel
Portrait
Spezifikationen
| Meike 35095 m43 35mm | Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 18 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 18 mm |
| Elements | 10 | 15 |
| Groups | 7 | 9 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Coating | Multi-layer nano coating | Super EBC coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | f/0.95 | f/1.4 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 13★ | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Fujifilm X |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.38 kg | 0.37 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 52 mm | 62 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | Linear motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 390 mm | 200 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:6.67★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Meike 35095 m43 35mm
- Strong build (68th percentile)
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong optical (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Preise
Meike 35095 m43 35mm0.233Score pro Dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm0.075Score pro Dollar
Meike 35095 m43 35mm bietet 3.1x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm
Scores 79 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
