Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon 2197

Nikon 2197

Nikon
44 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
98
Nikon
32
Portrait
Sigma
90
Nikon
53
Street
Sigma
88
Nikon
43
Budget
Sigma
85
Nikon
58
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Nikon
38
Macro
Sigma
83
Nikon
16
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Nikon
35
Landscape
Sigma
77
Nikon
32
Travel
Sigma
75
Nikon
39

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmNikon 2197
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min16 mm55 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm300 mm
Elements16
Groups11
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements5
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/4.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountSony E
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.58 kg
Filter Thread72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm
Max Magnification1:5.55

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Nikon 2197

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average build (22nd percentile)

Preise

Nikon 2197 is 520 $ cheaper (2.4x less).

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm0.103Score pro Dollar
vs
Nikon 21970.123Score pro Dollar

Nikon 2197 bietet 1.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Nikon 2197

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen