Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Viltrox LAB AF 35mm f/1.2 LAB FE 35mm
Viltrox
67 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm | Viltrox LAB AF 35mm f/1.2 LAB FE 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 16 | 15 |
| Groups | 11 | 10 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | 2 |
| ED Elements | 5 | 5 |
| Coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating | multilayer nanocoating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.2 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 11★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 0.97 kg |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping AF Motor | VCM |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm★ | 340 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.55 | 1:5.88 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
Viltrox LAB AF 35mm f/1.2 LAB FE 35mm
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong macro (67th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Preise
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm0.103Score pro Dollar
vs
Viltrox LAB AF 35mm f/1.2 LAB FE 35mm0.083Score pro Dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm bietet 1.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.
