Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
TTArtisan APS-C 35mm f/0.95 35mm
TTArtisan
58 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm | TTArtisan APS-C 35mm f/0.95 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 16 | 7 |
| Groups | 11 | 5 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | — |
| ED Elements | 5★ | — |
| Coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/0.95 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/0.95 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 10★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.45 kg | 0.42 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 52 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping AF Motor | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm★ | 350 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.55★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
TTArtisan APS-C 35mm f/0.95 35mm
- Strong aperture (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong bokeh (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong macro (66th percentile)
- Below average optical (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Preise
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm0.103Score pro Dollar
vs
TTArtisan APS-C 35mm f/0.95 35mm0.275Score pro Dollar
TTArtisan APS-C 35mm f/0.95 35mm bietet 2.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
