Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Leitz Cine HEKTOR 18mm T2.1 18mm
Leitz Cine
18 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm | Leitz Cine HEKTOR 18mm T2.1 18mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 18 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 18 mm |
| Elements | 16 | — |
| Groups | 11 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | — |
| ED Elements | 5★ | — |
| Coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | T22 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | T2.1 |
| Constant | ✓★ | — |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 0.84 kg |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping AF Motor | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm | 220 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.55★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
Leitz Cine HEKTOR 18mm T2.1 18mm
- Strong macro (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average build (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
Preise
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm0.103Score pro Dollar
vs
Leitz Cine HEKTOR 18mm T2.1 18mm0.002Score pro Dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm bietet 51.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
