Canon L 17-40mm f/4L USM
Canon
68 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Macro
Budget
Street
Portrait
Video Cinema
Travel
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Spezifikationen
| Canon L 17-40mm f/4L USM | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 40 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 12 | 13 |
| Groups | 9 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 3 |
| ED Elements | 1 | 3★ |
| Coating | Super Spectra coating | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/17 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/4 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | Nikon Z |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.06 kg★ | 0.45 kg |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | USM★ | Stepping Motor |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 279 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.24x | 1:5.26★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Canon L 17-40mm f/4L USM
- Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong optical (79th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
- Below average aperture (33rd percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
Preise
Canon L 17-40mm f/4L USM0.166Score pro Dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.086Score pro Dollar
Canon L 17-40mm f/4L USM bietet 1.9x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.
