Viltrox Air AF 9mm f/2.8 9mm
Viltrox
60 Gesamtbewertung
vs
TTArtisan APS-C AF 27mm f2.8 Frame 27mm
TTArtisan
58 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Macro
Budget
Travel
Street
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Professional
Spezifikationen
| Viltrox Air AF 9mm f/2.8 9mm | TTArtisan APS-C AF 27mm f2.8 Frame 27mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | — |
| Focal Length Min | 9 mm | 27 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 9 mm | 27 mm |
| Elements | 5 | — |
| Groups | 4 | — |
| Coating | advanced nano-coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/9 | f/27 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Fujifilm X |
| Weight | 0.13 kg★ | 0.20 kg |
| Filter Thread | 49 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | STM★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 14 mm★ | 27 mm |
Vor- & Nachteile
Viltrox Air AF 9mm f/2.8 9mm
- Strong macro (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average optical (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average social proof (30th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
TTArtisan APS-C AF 27mm f2.8 Frame 27mm
- Strong macro (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong build (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average bokeh (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average aperture (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Preise
Fazit
Gleichstand
Both products are closely matched - Viltrox Air AF 9mm f/2.8 9mm wins 2 specs while TTArtisan APS-C AF 27mm f2.8 Frame 27mm wins 1.
