Fujifilm GF20-35mmF4 R WR 35-28mm
Fujifilm
58 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Sony
90 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Travel
Street
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Landscape
Portrait
Professional
Macro
Spezifikationen
| Fujifilm GF20-35mmF4 R WR 35-28mm | Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 20 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | 14 | 9 |
| Groups | 10 | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 4★ |
| ED Elements | 4★ | 1 |
| Coating | Nano GI coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/4 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm G | Sony E |
| Format | medium-format | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.72 kg | 0.11 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 82 mm | 41 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | stepping motor★ | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 350 mm | 250 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.14x | 0.215x★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Fujifilm GF20-35mmF4 R WR 35-28mm
- Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong af (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong versatility (69th percentile)
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
- Below average macro (35th percentile)
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
Preise
Fujifilm GF20-35mmF4 R WR 35-28mm0.020Score pro Dollar
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.259Score pro Dollar
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS bietet 13.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.
