Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0
Sigma
66 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Sony
92 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Travel
Street
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Portrait
Landscape
Professional
Macro
Spezifikationen
| Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0 | Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 135 mm | 18 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 135 mm | 135 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 16 |
| Groups | 10 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | 4★ | 2 |
| Coating | wasserabweisende Beschichtung, antistatisches Glas | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.4 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.8 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.09 kg★ | 0.33 kg |
| Filter Thread | 105 mm | 55 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Hyper Sonic AF Motor | Linear motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 875 mm | 450 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.29x★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0
- Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong aperture (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong optical (79th percentile)
- Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
Preise
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B00.292Score pro Dollar
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.116Score pro Dollar
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0 bietet 2.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Scores 92 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.
