FotoZ KZ-03 24mm
FotoZ
74 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm
Vivitar
37 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Macro
Street
Budget
Travel
Portrait
Landscape
Video Cinema
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Spezifikationen
| FotoZ KZ-03 24mm | Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | macro |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 55 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 24 mm | 55 mm |
| Coating | nano-coatings | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | 55mm |
| Weight | 0.12 kg★ | 0.14 kg |
| Filter Thread | 41 mm | 55 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 16 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 10X★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
FotoZ KZ-03 24mm
- Strong macro (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong aperture (70th percentile)
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm
- Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong aperture (70th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (69th percentile)
- Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average social proof (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
Preise
FotoZ KZ-03 24mm1.680Score pro Dollar
vs
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm2.652Score pro Dollar
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm bietet 1.6x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: FotoZ KZ-03 24mm
Scores 74 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 11 specs.
