FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

FotoZ
72 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Altura Photo UM2267

Altura Photo UM2267

Altura Photo
74 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
FotoZ
90
Altura Photo
91
Street
FotoZ
71
Altura Photo
76
Budget
FotoZ
68
Altura Photo
69
Travel
FotoZ
65
Altura Photo
56
Portrait
FotoZ
61
Altura Photo
64
Video Cinema
FotoZ
60
Altura Photo
63
Landscape
FotoZ
59
Altura Photo
52
Wildlife Sports
FotoZ
55
Altura Photo
58
Professional
FotoZ
55
Altura Photo
56

Spezifikationen

FotoZ KZ-03 24mmAltura Photo UM2267
Optics
Typewide-anglewide-angle
Focal Length Min16 mm—
Focal Length Max24 mm—
Coatingnano-coatingsmulticoated glass optics
Build
MountSony EScrew-on lens fits camera lenses with a 49mm front filter thread
Weight0.12 kg★0.30 kg
Filter Thread41 mm49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—STM★
Stabilization✓✓
Focus
Min Focus Distance16 mm★45 mm
Max Magnification10X★—

Vor- & Nachteile

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

  • Strong macro (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (68th percentile)

Altura Photo UM2267

  • Strong macro (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong build (75th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Preise

Altura Photo UM2267 is 13 $ cheaper (1.4x less).

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm1.574Score pro Dollar
vs
Altura Photo UM22672.256Score pro Dollar

Altura Photo UM2267 bietet 1.4x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

Altura Photo UM2267

Fazit

═ Gleichstand

Both products are closely matched - FotoZ KZ-03 24mm wins 3 specs while Altura Photo UM2267 wins 1.

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm Besser bei:

TravelLandscape

Altura Photo UM2267 Besser bei:

StreetPortraitVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen