FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

FotoZ
74 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm

Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm

Insta360
35 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
FotoZ
86
Insta360
16
Street
FotoZ
73
Insta360
45
Budget
FotoZ
68
Insta360
36
Travel
FotoZ
68
Insta360
17
Portrait
FotoZ
66
Insta360
65
Landscape
FotoZ
60
Insta360
15
Video Cinema
FotoZ
60
Insta360
46
Professional
FotoZ
58
Insta360
40
Wildlife Sports
FotoZ
58
Insta360
32

Spezifikationen

FotoZ KZ-03 24mmInsta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm
Optics
Typewide-anglefisheye
Focal Length Min16 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max24 mm35 mm
Coatingnano-coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.94
Min Aperturef/1.94
Constant
Build
MountSony EInsta360 X4 Air
Weight0.12 kg
Filter Thread41 mm
AF & Stabilization
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance16 mm
Max Magnification10X

Vor- & Nachteile

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

  • Strong macro (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (70th percentile)

Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm

  • Strong aperture (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average build (31st percentile)

Preise

Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm is 19 $ cheaper (1.8x less).

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm1.680Score pro Dollar
vs
Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm1.385Score pro Dollar

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm bietet 1.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm

Fazit

Gewinner: FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

Scores 74 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 13 specs.

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen