Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm
Meike
41 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm
Yongnuo
81 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Street
Landscape
Video Cinema
Travel
Budget
Macro
Spezifikationen
| Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm | Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | fisheye | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 4 mm | 12 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 4 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | — | 14 |
| Groups | — | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | — | Nano Surface Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Format | micro-four-thirds | micro-four-thirds |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.19 kg★ | 0.32 kg |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | STM stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 250 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.5x★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong build (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average social proof (35th percentile)
Preise
Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm0.299Score pro Dollar
vs
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm0.225Score pro Dollar
Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm
Scores 81 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
