Sigma 750975

Sigma 750975

Sigma
39 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
27
Nikon
89
Macro
Sigma
15
Nikon
87
Budget
Sigma
54
Nikon
86
Street
Sigma
39
Nikon
85
Portrait
Sigma
48
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Sigma
34
Nikon
82
Landscape
Sigma
26
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
30
Nikon
73
Travel
Sigma
31
Nikon
71

Spezifikationen

Sigma 750975Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Type—zoom
Focal Length Min100 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max400 mm28 mm
Elements—13
Groups—11
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements—3★
Coating—Multi-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperture—f/2.8
Min Aperturef/5-6.3f/2.8
Constant—✓★
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
Mount—Nikon Z
Format—full-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight1.10 kg0.45 kg★
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—Stepping Motor★
Stabilization—✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance—190 mm★
Max Magnification—1:5.26★

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma 750975

  • Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average build (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Preise

Both products are similarly priced.

Sigma 7509750.038Score pro Dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.087Score pro Dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 bietet 2.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen