Contour Design RM-PRO3
Contour Design
4 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16" NP960XMA-KB1US Sapphire 2024
Samsung
68 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Developer
Entertainment
Business
Student
Compact
Creator
Ai Llm
Gaming
Spezifikationen
| Contour Design RM-PRO3 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16" NP960XMA-KB1US | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 |
| Cores | — | 12★ |
| Frequency | — | 3.4 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 6 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | — | Qualcomm Adreno★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | — | 59★ |
| Type | — | integrated★ |
| VRAM Type | — | Shared |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | — | 16 GB★ |
| RAM Generation | — | LPDDR5X★ |
| Storage 1 | — | 512 GB★ |
| Storage 1 Type | — | NVMe SSD★ |
| Display | ||
| Size | — | 16" |
| Resolution | — | 2880 px★ |
| Panel | — | OLED★ |
| Refresh Rate | — | 120 Hz★ |
| Brightness | — | 400 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | — | 3K AMOLED |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | — | 2★ |
| USB Ports | — | 0★ |
| Thunderbolt | — | 0 |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 7★ |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 0.75 kg★ | 1.54 kg |
| Battery | — | 35 Wh★ |
| OS | — | Windows 11 Home |
Vor- & Nachteile
Contour Design RM-PRO3
- Below average storage (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average reliability (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average port selection (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average social proof (10th percentile)10th %ile
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16" NP960XMA-KB1US Sapphire 2024
- Strong cpu (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong screen (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average gpu (24th percentile)
Preise
Contour Design RM-PRO30.012Score pro Dollar
vs
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16" NP960XMA-KB1US Sapphire 20240.047Score pro Dollar
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16" NP960XMA-KB1US Sapphire 2024 bietet 3.9x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16" NP960XMA-KB1US
Scores 68 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 18 of 27 specs.
