Tiinlab Corporation SonoFlow HQ31

Tiinlab Corporation SonoFlow HQ31

Tiinlab Corporation
54 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic
82 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Tiinlab Corporation
65
Beyerdynamic
84
Commute
Tiinlab Corporation
49
Beyerdynamic
84
Music
Tiinlab Corporation
56
Beyerdynamic
81
Gaming
Tiinlab Corporation
64
Beyerdynamic
81
Work
Tiinlab Corporation
52
Beyerdynamic
78
Studio
Tiinlab Corporation
43
Beyerdynamic
77
Calls
Tiinlab Corporation
46
Beyerdynamic
68

Spezifikationen

Tiinlab Corporation SonoFlow HQ31Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Design
Form Factorover-earon-ear
Open/Closedclosed
Foldable
Weight0.22 kg
Ear Cushionreplaceable ear pads
Headbandaluminum and durable textiles
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size40 mm45 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max40 kHz22 kHz
Impedance32 Ω48 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDACAAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC
SurroundSpatial Audio
Noise Control
ANC
ANC TypehybridAdaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
ProfilesAVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm
Detachable Cable
Range15 m
Battery
Battery Life90 hrs40 hrs
Charge Time1.5 hrs
Fast Charging5-minute charge gives you 5 hours of listening15 Minutes for 15 Hours
ChargingUSB-C
Capacity630 mAh
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count22
NC Mic
Boom Mic
Detachable Mic
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Fast Pair
Touch Controls
App1MORE Musicbeyerdynamic app
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode

Vor- & Nachteile

Tiinlab Corporation SonoFlow HQ31

  • Strong battery (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong sound (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong mic (79th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (21st percentile)
  • Below average comfort (32nd percentile)

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

  • Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile

Preise

Tiinlab Corporation SonoFlow HQ31 is 144 $ cheaper (5.0x less).

Tiinlab Corporation SonoFlow HQ311.498Score pro Dollar
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 10016090.453Score pro Dollar

Tiinlab Corporation SonoFlow HQ31 bietet 3.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Tiinlab Corporation SonoFlow HQ31

Fazit

Gewinner: Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Scores 82 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 12 of 40 specs.

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 Besser bei:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute

Auch in Betracht ziehen