AKG K371

AKG K371

AKG
41 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Bose 880066-0100

Bose 880066-0100

Bose
58 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Studio
AKG
65
Bose
32
Budget
AKG
49
Bose
64
Work
AKG
31
Bose
63
Music
AKG
61
Bose
48
Calls
AKG
22
Bose
59
Gaming
AKG
39
Bose
59
Commute
AKG
39
Bose
55

Spezifikationen

AKG K371Bose 880066-0100
Design
Form Factorover-earover-ear
Open/Closedclosedclosed
Foldable
Weight0.26 kg0.25 kg
Ear Cushionslow-retention foam
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Driver Size50 mm
Freq Min5 Hz
Freq Max40 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity114 dB
CodecsAAC
Noise Control
ANC
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
ProfilesA2DP, AVRCP, HFP, HSP
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm
Detachable Cable
Cable Length3 m
Battery
Battery Life24 hrs
Charge Time4 hrs
Fast Charging10 min for 5 hours playback
ChargingUSB-C
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantSiri, Google Assistant
Touch Controls
AppBose Music

Vor- & Nachteile

AKG K371

  • Strong sound (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average mic (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average anc (33rd percentile)

Bose 880066-0100

  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong mic (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong anc (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average comfort (34th percentile)

Preise

AKG K371 is 139 $ cheaper (1.7x less).

AKG K3710.217Score pro Dollar
vs
Bose 880066-01000.175Score pro Dollar

AKG K371 bietet 1.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fazit

Gewinner: Bose 880066-0100

Scores 58 overall, wins 5 of 7 usage categories and 12 of 30 specs.

AKG K371 Besser bei:

MusicStudio

Bose 880066-0100 Besser bei:

WorkCallsBudgetGamingCommute

Auch in Betracht ziehen