Apple BTH12

Apple BTH12

Apple
83 Gesamtbewertung
vs
HP HP-200F

HP HP-200F

HP
29 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Apple
80
HP
36
Gaming
Apple
74
HP
28
Studio
Apple
65
HP
39
Music
Apple
63
HP
36
Work
Apple
56
HP
18
Commute
Apple
55
HP
20
Calls
Apple
55
HP
11

Spezifikationen

Apple BTH12HP HP-200F
Design
Form Factorover-earon-ear
Open/Closedopen
Foldable
Weight0.17 kg0.09 kg
Ear CushionLeather
Audio
Driver TypeDynamic Driverdynamic
Driver Size40 mm30 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max21 kHz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
CodecsiClever BTH12 Kids Bluetooth Headphones,Colorful LED Lights,74/85dBA Safe Volume,85H Playtime,Fast Charging,Bluetooth 5.2,Over Ear Kids Headphones Wireles for iPad/Tablet/Airplane,Black/Red
Noise Control
ANC
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.2
Wired Connector3.5mm3.5mm
Detachable Cable
Cable Length1.2200000286102295 m
Battery
Battery Life85 hrs
Charge Time0.17000000178813934 hrs
Fast Charging10 minutes gives you 7 hours of playtime
ChargingUSB-C
Microphone
Microphone
NC Mic
Features
Touch Controls
Volume Limiting
Water ResistanceWater-Resistant

Vor- & Nachteile

Apple BTH12

  • Strong comfort (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong battery (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong build (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong social proof (91th percentile)91th %ile
  • Below average anc (30th percentile)

HP HP-200F

  • Strong comfort (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average social proof (27th percentile)
  • Below average anc (30th percentile)

Preise

HP HP-200F is 12 $ cheaper (2.0x less).

Apple BTH123.464Score pro Dollar
vs
HP HP-200F2.399Score pro Dollar

Apple BTH12 bietet 1.4x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fazit

Gewinner: Apple BTH12

Scores 83 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 11 of 27 specs.

Apple BTH12 Besser bei:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute

Auch in Betracht ziehen