TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
85 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony WI-SP500

Sony WI-SP500

Sony
22 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
TOZO
79
Sony
25
Gaming
TOZO
79
Sony
22
Travel
TOZO
78
Sony
16
Fitness
TOZO
72
Sony
32
Calls
TOZO
70
Sony
23
Commute
TOZO
70
Sony
14
Music
TOZO
68
Sony
23

Spezifikationen

TOZO Crystal PodsSony WI-SP500
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear TipsMedium
Weight0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicopen-type
Driver Size10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDACSony WI-SP500 Wireless in-Ear Sports Headphones, Bluetooth Earbuds, Black (International Version)
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs8 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOthervoice assistants
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5IPX4

Vor- & Nachteile

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Sony WI-SP500

  • Strong build (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average battery (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average comfort (28th percentile)
  • Below average sound (30th percentile)

Preise

TOZO Crystal Pods is 23 $ cheaper (2.4x less).

TOZO Crystal Pods5.245Score pro Dollar
vs
Sony WI-SP5000.564Score pro Dollar

TOZO Crystal Pods bietet 9.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fazit

Gewinner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 20 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Auch in Betracht ziehen