TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
85 Gesamtbewertung
vs
QCY BH20T13A

QCY BH20T13A

QCY
16 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
TOZO
79
QCY
22
Gaming
TOZO
79
QCY
10
Travel
TOZO
78
QCY
14
Fitness
TOZO
72
QCY
14
Calls
TOZO
70
QCY
7
Commute
TOZO
70
QCY
13
Music
TOZO
68
QCY
15

Spezifikationen

TOZO Crystal PodsQCY BH20T13A
Design
Form Factorin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear TipsMedium
Weight0.04 kg0.09 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Driver Size10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5

Vor- & Nachteile

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

QCY BH20T13A

  • Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
  • Below average social proof (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average mic (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average sound (30th percentile)

Preise

TOZO Crystal Pods is 10 $ cheaper (1.6x less).

TOZO Crystal Pods5.245Score pro Dollar
vs
QCY BH20T13A0.600Score pro Dollar

TOZO Crystal Pods bietet 8.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fazit

Gewinner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 23 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Auch in Betracht ziehen