TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
84 Gesamtbewertung
vs
JLab Jbuds Pods ANC

JLab Jbuds Pods ANC

JLab
86 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
TOZO
80
JLab
84
Calls
TOZO
70
JLab
83
Travel
TOZO
78
JLab
82
Commute
TOZO
70
JLab
81
Budget
TOZO
80
JLab
78
Fitness
TOZO
72
JLab
76
Music
TOZO
68
JLab
69

Spezifikationen

TOZO Crystal PodsJLab Jbuds Pods ANC
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelessstem
Ear TipsMediumS, M, L
Weight0.04 kg0.12 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm11 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min20 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDACSBC, AAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybridhybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.45.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs10 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs0.16699999570846558 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play10 min for 2 hours playback
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs56 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count46
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOtherGoogle Assistant
Touch Controls
AppTOZO AppJlab App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5IP55

Vor- & Nachteile

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

JLab Jbuds Pods ANC

  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong battery (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile

Preise

TOZO Crystal Pods is 34 $ cheaper (3.1x less).

TOZO Crystal Pods5.239Score pro Dollar
vs
JLab Jbuds Pods ANC1.718Score pro Dollar

TOZO Crystal Pods bietet 3.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fazit

Gleichstand

Both products are closely matched - TOZO Crystal Pods wins 4 specs while JLab Jbuds Pods ANC wins 6.

JLab Jbuds Pods ANC Besser bei:

CallsGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Auch in Betracht ziehen