TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
84 Gesamtbewertung
vs
JLab EBFLEXRBLK124

JLab EBFLEXRBLK124

JLab
50 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
TOZO
80
JLab
49
Budget
TOZO
80
JLab
53
Travel
TOZO
78
JLab
34
Fitness
TOZO
72
JLab
49
Calls
TOZO
70
JLab
43
Commute
TOZO
70
JLab
29
Music
TOZO
68
JLab
37

Spezifikationen

TOZO Crystal PodsJLab EBFLEXRBLK124
Design
Form Factorin-earopen-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelessclip on
Ear TipsMedium
Weight0.04 kg0.06 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Driver Size10 mm12 mm
Freq Min20 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω12 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.45.3
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs6 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs21 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count42
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO AppJLab App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5Water-Resistant

Vor- & Nachteile

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

JLab EBFLEXRBLK124

  • Strong connectivity (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong mic (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong build (74th percentile)
  • Strong comfort (73rd percentile)
  • Below average battery (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

Preise

TOZO Crystal Pods is 24 $ cheaper (2.5x less).

TOZO Crystal Pods5.239Score pro Dollar
vs
JLab EBFLEXRBLK1241.245Score pro Dollar

TOZO Crystal Pods bietet 4.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fazit

Gewinner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 12 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Auch in Betracht ziehen