TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
85 Gesamtbewertung
vs
MOSWAG 001

MOSWAG 001

MOSWAG
40 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
TOZO
79
MOSWAG
51
Gaming
TOZO
79
MOSWAG
29
Travel
TOZO
78
MOSWAG
23
Fitness
TOZO
72
MOSWAG
19
Calls
TOZO
70
MOSWAG
23
Commute
TOZO
70
MOSWAG
22
Music
TOZO
68
MOSWAG
33

Spezifikationen

TOZO Crystal PodsMOSWAG 001
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear TipsMediumXS, S, M, L
Weight0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm14.199999809265137 mm
Freq Min20 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB105 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDACMOSWAG USB C Headphones, Wired Earbuds in-Ear Type C Earphone, Microphone & Volume Control HiFi Stereo Type C Earphones for iPhone 17/16/15 Pro Max, Galaxy S24/S23/S22/S21/A53 Pixel 8/7/6-1Pack
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5

Vor- & Nachteile

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

MOSWAG 001

  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong sound (75th percentile)
  • Below average comfort (28th percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (30th percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)
  • Below average build (35th percentile)

Preise

MOSWAG 001 is 9 $ cheaper (2.3x less).

Fazit

Gewinner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Auch in Betracht ziehen