JVC HAEB75A
JVC
41 Gesamtbewertung
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods
TOZO
85 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Gaming
Travel
Fitness
Commute
Music
Calls
Spezifikationen
| JVC HAEB75A | TOZO Crystal Pods | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | ear-clip | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | — | Medium |
| Weight | 0.03 kg★ | 0.04 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | neodymium | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 13.5 mm★ | 10 mm |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 20 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 100 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | LDAC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | hybrid |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4★ |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 7 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play |
| Charging | proprietary | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 35 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 4★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Other |
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| App | — | TOZO App |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | Water-Resistant | IPX5 |
Vor- & Nachteile
JVC HAEB75A
- Strong build (73rd percentile)
- Strong comfort (73rd percentile)
- Strong sound (66th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
TOZO Crystal Pods
- Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong mic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
Preise
Fazit
Gewinner: TOZO Crystal Pods
Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 20 of 35 specs.
