Technics EAH-AZ100-N
Technics
100 Gesamtbewertung
vs
PALOVUE EarFlowC Plus
PALOVUE
36 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Calls
Travel
Budget
Music
Commute
Gaming
Fitness
Spezifikationen
| Technics EAH-AZ100-N | PALOVUE EarFlowC Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | magnetic |
| Ear Tips | Extra large, Large, Medium, Small | three different ear tips |
| Weight | 0.05 kg | 0.04 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 96 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC | — |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | — |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | — |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback | — |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | intelligent voice wake up |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | ✗ |
| App | Android & iOS | — |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Technics EAH-AZ100-N
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
PALOVUE EarFlowC Plus
- Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong sound (77th percentile)
- Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
- Below average connectivity (28th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (31st percentile)
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
- Below average build (35th percentile)
Preise
Technics EAH-AZ100-N0.403Score pro Dollar
vs
PALOVUE EarFlowC Plus2.150Score pro Dollar
PALOVUE EarFlowC Plus bietet 5.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Technics EAH-AZ100-N
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 40 specs.
