Q10

Q10

Blue Microphones
44 Gesamtbewertung
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
84 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
Blue Microphones
55
TOZO
80
Budget
Blue Microphones
42
TOZO
80
Travel
Blue Microphones
31
TOZO
78
Fitness
Blue Microphones
46
TOZO
72
Calls
Blue Microphones
38
TOZO
70
Commute
Blue Microphones
29
TOZO
70
Music
Blue Microphones
37
TOZO
68

Spezifikationen

Q10TOZO Crystal Pods
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesstrue wireless
Ear TipsMedium
Weight0.05 kg0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size13 mm10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.35.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7.5 hrs7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery26 hrs35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count24
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX4IPX5

Vor- & Nachteile

Q10

  • Strong mic (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong build (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong connectivity (79th percentile)
  • Strong comfort (73rd percentile)
  • Below average battery (22nd percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Preise

Both products are similarly priced.

Q102.613Score pro Dollar
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods5.239Score pro Dollar

TOZO Crystal Pods bietet 2.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fazit

Gewinner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Auch in Betracht ziehen