AMAFACE B89
AMAFACE
47 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
96 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Calls
Travel
Budget
Music
Commute
Gaming
Fitness
Spezifikationen
| AMAFACE B89 | Technics EAH-AZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | — | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | XS, S, M, L | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | 0.04 kg | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Wireless Earbuds, Bluetooth 5.0 Stereo Headphones, in-Ear Sweat-Proof Wireless Earphones Dual Mic and Noise Reduction, Touch Control Headset with Cartoon Blue Changing Men Charging Case | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Dolby Atmos |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 5 hrs | 8 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | 5 minutes for 2 hours of calling | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 36 hrs★ | 28 hrs |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2 | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | — | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX5 | IPX4 |
Vor- & Nachteile
AMAFACE B89
- Strong build (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Strong mic (79th percentile)
- Strong battery (76th percentile)
- Strong social proof (76th percentile)
- Below average sound (27th percentile)
- Below average anc (29th percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
Preise
AMAFACE B892.146Score pro Dollar
vs
Technics EAH-AZ1000.412Score pro Dollar
AMAFACE B89 bietet 5.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 38 specs.
