MAS CARNEY TH9
MAS CARNEY
29 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Fhumsh A10
Fhumsh
61 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Gaming
Travel
Budget
Commute
Calls
Music
Fitness
Spezifikationen
| MAS CARNEY TH9 | Fhumsh A10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | semi-in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | semi-in-ear | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | — | S, M, L |
| Weight | 0.05 kg★ | 0.20 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 13 mm★ |
| Impedance | 120 Ω | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | Wireless Earbuds, Bluetooth 5.3 Headphones DK-White |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | Environmental Noise Cancellation |
| Transparency | ✗ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Multipoint | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 8 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 1.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 1.5 hours to fully charge |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 50 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✗ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| NC Mic | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Touch Controls | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX7 |
Vor- & Nachteile
MAS CARNEY TH9
- Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
- Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average sound (30th percentile)
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
- Below average build (35th percentile)
Fhumsh A10
- Strong battery (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong connectivity (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong anc (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average build (35th percentile)
Preise
MAS CARNEY TH94.858Score pro Dollar
vs
Fhumsh A103.584Score pro Dollar
MAS CARNEY TH9 bietet 1.4x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Fhumsh A10
Scores 61 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 11 of 28 specs.
