HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Acer Aspire C27

Acer Aspire C27

Acer
47 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
HP
91
Acer
10
Developer
HP
87
Acer
38
Creator
HP
86
Acer
18
Business
HP
86
Acer
42
Workstation
HP
85
Acer
37
Home Office
HP
85
Acer
44
Ai Llm
HP
67
Acer
17
Compact
HP
30
Acer
35

Spezifikationen

HP OMEN GT16-0364Acer Aspire C27
Processor
CPU*AMD Ryzen 7 8700FAMD Ryzen 7 5825U
CPU Multi-Core Score
31,207
17,985
Cores88
Frequency4.1 GHz2.0 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Graphics
GPU*NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070AMD Radeon Graphics (Vega 8 iGPU)
GPU Benchmark Score
28,796
1,567
Typediscreteintegrated
VRAM12 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR7Shared
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB16 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR4
Storage 11 TB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeSSDSSD
Build
Form Factormid-toweraio
PSU850W
Weight14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports2
USB Ports86
Thunderbolt0
HDMI1 x HDMI1x HDMI Out
DisplayPort3 x DisplayPort1x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6E
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3Bluetooth 5.2
EthernetGigabit EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Vor- & Nachteile

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong port (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Acer Aspire C27

  • Below average ram (31th percentile)
  • Below average reliability (32th percentile)

Preise

Acer Aspire C27 is 1.201 $ cheaper (2.5x less).

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 20250.047Score pro Dollar
vs
Acer Aspire C270.059Score pro Dollar

Acer Aspire C27 bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

Acer Aspire C27

Fazit

Gewinner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 95 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 13 of 26 specs.

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

Acer Aspire C27 Besser bei:

Compact

Auch in Betracht ziehen