HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
BOSGAME P3

BOSGAME P3

BOSGAME
60 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
HP
91
BOSGAME
14
Business
HP
87
BOSGAME
53
Developer
HP
87
BOSGAME
52
Creator
HP
87
BOSGAME
25
Home Office
HP
87
BOSGAME
61
Workstation
HP
85
BOSGAME
53
Ai Llm
HP
67
BOSGAME
25
Compact
HP
31
BOSGAME
55

Spezifikationen

HP OMEN GT16-0364BOSGAME P3
Processor
CPU*AMD Ryzen 7 8700FAMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
CPU Multi-Core Score
30,931
28,374
Cores88
Frequency4.1 GHz5.1 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Graphics
GPU*NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070AMD Radeon 780M
GPU Benchmark Score
28,703
5,939
Typediscreteintegrated
VRAM12 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR7Shared
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB16 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 11 TB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeSSDNVMe SSD
Build
Form Factormid-towermini
PSU850W
Weight14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports2
USB Ports8
Thunderbolt0
HDMI1 x HDMI
DisplayPort3 x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6E
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3Bluetooth 5.2
EthernetGigabit EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Pro

Vor- & Nachteile

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

BOSGAME P3

  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong storage (73rd percentile)
  • Below average reliability (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average port selection (27th percentile)

Preise

BOSGAME P3 is 1.150 $ cheaper (2.7x less).

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 20250.053Score pro Dollar
vs
BOSGAME P30.090Score pro Dollar

BOSGAME P3 bietet 1.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

BOSGAME P3

Fazit

Gewinner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 95 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 10 of 26 specs.

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

BOSGAME P3 Besser bei:

Compact

Auch in Betracht ziehen