HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
MSI Cubi 5 12M Cubi 5 12M-444US Black

MSI Cubi 5 12M Cubi 5 12M-444US Black

MSI
45 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
HP
91
MSI
8
Business
HP
87
MSI
41
Creator
HP
87
MSI
15
Developer
HP
87
MSI
34
Home Office
HP
87
MSI
41
Workstation
HP
85
MSI
28
Ai Llm
HP
67
MSI
14
Compact
HP
31
MSI
51

Spezifikationen

HP OMEN GT16-0364MSI Cubi 5 12M Cubi 5 12M-444US
Processor
CPU*AMD Ryzen 7 8700FIntel Core i5-1235U
CPU Multi-Core Score
30,931
12,540
Cores810
Frequency4.1 GHz1.3 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB12 MB
Graphics
GPU*NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070Intel Iris Xe Graphics
GPU Benchmark Score
28,703
2,593
Typediscreteintegrated
VRAM12 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR7Shared
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB8 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR4
Storage 11 TB500 GB
Storage 1 TypeSSDNVMe SSD
Build
Form Factormid-towermini
PSU850W65W
Weight14.50 kg1.40 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports21
USB Ports84
Thunderbolt0Thunderbolt 4 x 1
HDMI1 x HDMI1x HDMI
DisplayPort3 x DisplayPort1x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6E
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3Bluetooth 5.3
EthernetGigabit EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Pro

Vor- & Nachteile

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

MSI Cubi 5 12M Cubi 5 12M-444US Black

  • Strong port selection (70th percentile)
  • Below average ram (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average cpu (30th percentile)

Preise

MSI Cubi 5 12M Cubi 5 12M-444US Black is 846 $ cheaper (1.9x less).

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

MSI Cubi 5 12M Cubi 5 12M-444US Black

Fazit

Gewinner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 95 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 13 of 26 specs.

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

MSI Cubi 5 12M Cubi 5 12M-444US Besser bei:

Compact

Auch in Betracht ziehen