ASUS V500 Black

ASUS V500 Black

ASUS
58 Gesamtbewertung
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
94 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
ASUS
13
HP
90
Business
ASUS
61
HP
86
Developer
ASUS
58
HP
86
Creator
ASUS
24
HP
86
Workstation
ASUS
53
HP
85
Home Office
ASUS
58
HP
84
Ai Llm
ASUS
25
HP
66
Compact
ASUS
24
HP
30

Spezifikationen

ASUS V500HP OMEN GT16-0364
Processor
CPU*Intel Core i7 13620HAMD Ryzen 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core Score
23,608
31,207
Cores108
Frequency2.4 GHz4.1 GHz
L3 Cache24 MB16 MB
Graphics
GPU*Intel UHD Graphics 600NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GPU Benchmark Score
1,514
28,796
Typeintegrateddiscrete
VRAM12 GB
VRAM TypeSharedGDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 11 TB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeSSDSSD
Build
Form FactorTowermid-tower
PSU850W
Weight6.00 kg14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports12
USB Ports68
Thunderbolt0
HDMI1x HDMI 1.41 x HDMI
DisplayPort1x DisplayPort 1.43 x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetoothBluetooth 5.3
EthernetEthernet (RJ-45)Gigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 ProWindows 11 Home

Vor- & Nachteile

ASUS V500 Black

  • Strong social proof (82th percentile)82th %ile
  • Strong ram (76th percentile)
  • Strong port (70th percentile)
  • Below average gpu (31th percentile)

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong port (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (87th percentile)87th %ile

Preise

ASUS V500 Black is 1.071 $ cheaper (2.2x less).

ASUS V500 Black0.062Score pro Dollar
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 20250.047Score pro Dollar

ASUS V500 Black bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

ASUS V500 Black

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

Fazit

Gewinner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 94 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 10 of 26 specs.

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingCompactCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

Auch in Betracht ziehen