MSI Codex Z2 A8NVL-484US Black 2025

MSI Codex Z2 A8NVL-484US Black 2025

MSI
79 Gesamtbewertung
vs
HP 800 G2 2016

HP 800 G2 2016

HP
43 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Home Office
MSI
77
HP
39
Gaming
MSI
73
HP
41
Business
MSI
71
HP
43
Workstation
MSI
70
HP
34
Developer
MSI
70
HP
34
Creator
MSI
69
HP
36
Ai Llm
MSI
44
HP
19
Compact
MSI
33
HP
24

Spezifikationen

MSI Codex Z2 A8NVL-484USHP 800 G2
Processor
CPU*AMD Ryzen 7 8700FIntel Core i5 6th Gen
CPU Multi-Core Score
31,207
5,602
Cores84
Frequency4.1 GHz3.6 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB6 MB
Graphics
GPUNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060NVIDIA GT1030
GPU Benchmark Score
20,798
Keine Daten
Typediscretediscrete
VRAM8 GB2 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM16 GB16 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR4
Storage 12 TB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSDSSD
Build
Form Factormid-towerTower
PSU650W
Weight9.70 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports1
USB Ports88
HDMI1x HDMI
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 1.4a2x Display Port
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3Bluetooth
EthernetGigabit EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Pro

Vor- & Nachteile

MSI Codex Z2 A8NVL-484US Black 2025

  • Strong storage (91th percentile)91th %ile
  • Strong port (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong social proof (78th percentile)
  • Strong cpu (71th percentile)

HP 800 G2 2016

  • Strong reliability (71th percentile)
  • Below average cpu (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average ram (29th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (34th percentile)

Preise

HP 800 G2 2016 is 799 $ cheaper (2.8x less).

MSI Codex Z2 A8NVL-484US Black 20250.063Score pro Dollar
vs
HP 800 G2 20160.096Score pro Dollar

HP 800 G2 2016 bietet 1.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

HP 800 G2 2016

Fazit

Gewinner: MSI Codex Z2 A8NVL-484US

Scores 79 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 15 of 25 specs.

MSI Codex Z2 A8NVL-484US Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingCompactCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

Auch in Betracht ziehen