MSI AM273QAI1UM040

MSI AM273QAI1UM040

MSI
53 Gesamtbewertung
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
96 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
MSI
11
HP
91
Developer
MSI
50
HP
87
Creator
MSI
21
HP
87
Home Office
MSI
50
HP
87
Business
MSI
48
HP
87
Workstation
MSI
43
HP
86
Ai Llm
MSI
22
HP
67
Compact
MSI
33
HP
31

Spezifikationen

MSI AM273QAI1UM040HP OMEN GT16-0364
Processor
CPU*Intel Core Ultra 5 125HAMD Ryzen 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core Score
20,192
30,931
Cores148
Frequency1.2 GHz4.1 GHz
L3 Cache18 MB16 MB
Graphics
GPU*Intel GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GPU Benchmark Score
3,170
28,703
Typeintegrateddiscrete
VRAM16 GB12 GB
VRAM TypeDDR5 SDRAMGDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM16 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 11 TB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeSSDSSD
Build
Form Factoraiomid-tower
PSU120W850W
Weight5.00 kg14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports12
USB Ports58
ThunderboltThunderbolt 4 x 20
HDMI2 x HDMI1 x HDMI
DisplayPort3 x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetoothBluetooth 5.3
EthernetGigabit EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Vor- & Nachteile

MSI AM273QAI1UM040

  • Below average social proof (7th percentile)7th %ile

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Preise

MSI AM273QAI1UM040 is 1.015 $ cheaper (2.3x less).

MSI AM273QAI1UM0400.066Score pro Dollar
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 20250.053Score pro Dollar

MSI AM273QAI1UM040 bietet 1.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

Fazit

Gewinner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 11 of 26 specs.

MSI AM273QAI1UM040 Besser bei:

Compact

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

Auch in Betracht ziehen