Intel Xeon 4215R 4-core LGA 3647
Intel
46 Gesamtbewertung
vs
G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4
G.Skill
66 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Efficiency
Productivity
Gaming
Budget
Ai Llm
Server
Spezifikationen
| Intel Xeon 4215R | G.Skill Trident Z Neo | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | AMD |
| Series | Xeon | Ryzen 5 |
| Model | 4215R | 3600 |
| Codename | — | Matisse |
| Class | server | desktop |
| Process | — | 7★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 4 | 6★ |
| P-cores | — | 6★ |
| Threads | 16★ | 12 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 4★ | 3 |
| L3 Cache | 11 | 32★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | Keine Daten | |
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| Max Memory | — | 32★ |
| ECC | — | ✗ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA 3647 | AMD Socket AM4 |
| PCIe | — | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16★ |
| TDP | — | 65★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✓★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Intel Xeon 4215R 4-core LGA 3647
- Strong multi thread (69th percentile)
- Below average affordability (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average platform (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
- Below average efficiency (30th percentile)
G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4
- Strong feature (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong efficiency (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong platform (79th percentile)
- Strong single thread (73rd percentile)
- Below average affordability (20th percentile)20th %ile
Preise
Intel Xeon 4215R 4-core LGA 36470.056Score pro Dollar
vs
G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM40.175Score pro Dollar
G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4 bietet 3.1x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: G.Skill Trident Z Neo
Scores 66 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 25 specs.
