Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 LGA 2011

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 LGA 2011

Intel
9 Gesamtbewertung
vs
G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4

G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4

G.Skill
65 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Efficiency
Intel
1
G.Skill
76
Productivity
Intel
8
G.Skill
69
Gaming
Intel
5
G.Skill
61
Budget
Intel
21
G.Skill
60
Ai Llm
Intel
7
G.Skill
58
Server
Intel
7
G.Skill
55

Spezifikationen

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3G.Skill Trident Z Neo
Processor
BrandIntelAMD
SeriesXeonRyzen 5
ModelE5-2620v33600
Codename—Matisse
Classserverdesktop
Process—7★
Cores & Clocks
Cores—6★
P-cores—6★
Threads—12★
Base Clock
2,400
3,600
Boost ClockKeine Daten
4,200
Cache
L2 Cache15★3
L3 Cache1532★
Performance
PassMark MultiKeine Daten
17,645
PassMark SingleKeine Daten
2,557
Memory
Memory Type—DDR4★
Max SpeedKeine Daten
3,600
Channels—2★
Max Memory—32★
ECC—✗
Platform & Power
SocketLGA 2011AMD Socket AM4
PCIe—4.0
PCIe Lanes—16★
TDP—65★
Unlocked—✓★

Vor- & Nachteile

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 LGA 2011

  • Strong affordability (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average social proof (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile

G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4

  • Strong feature (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong platform (78th percentile)
  • Strong ai (72nd percentile)
  • Below average affordability (21st percentile)

Preise

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 LGA 2011 is 345 $ cheaper (12.9x less).

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 LGA 20110.293Score pro Dollar
vs
G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM40.175Score pro Dollar

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 LGA 2011 bietet 1.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 LGA 2011

G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4

Fazit

★ Gewinner: G.Skill Trident Z Neo

Scores 65 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 16 of 25 specs.

G.Skill Trident Z Neo Besser bei:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

Auch in Betracht ziehen