MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
MICRO CENTER
66 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6326 16-core LGA4189
Intel
30 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Productivity
Efficiency
Gaming
Budget
Ai Llm
Server
Spezifikationen
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | Intel Xeon Gold 6326 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | — | Intel |
| Series | — | Xeon Gold |
| Model | — | 6326 |
| Class | — | server |
| Process | — | 10★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 16★ |
| Threads | — | 32★ |
| Base Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Boost Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 4★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 24★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | — | LGA4189 |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
Vor- & Nachteile
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
- Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong efficiency (67th percentile)
- Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average platform (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
Intel Xeon Gold 6326 16-core LGA4189
- Below average affordability (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average single thread (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
- Below average efficiency (24th percentile)
Preise
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF0.067Score pro Dollar
vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6326 16-core LGA41890.010Score pro Dollar
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF bietet 6.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
Scores 66 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 2 of 16 specs.
