BX80768265F
Intel
90 Gesamtbewertung
vs
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
MICRO CENTER
66 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Efficiency
Productivity
Ai Llm
Budget
Gaming
Server
Spezifikationen
| BX80768265F | MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | — |
| Series | Core Ultra 7 | — |
| Model | 265F | — |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | — |
| Class | desktop | — |
| Process | 3★ | — |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 20★ | — |
| P-cores | 8★ | — |
| E-cores | 12★ | — |
| Threads | 20★ | — |
| Base Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Boost Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 36★ | — |
| L3 Cache | 30★ | — |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR5★ | — |
| Max Speed | Keine Daten | |
| Channels | 2★ | — |
| Max Memory | Keine Daten | |
| ECC | ✗ | — |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA1851 | — |
| PCIe | 5.0 | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24★ | — |
| TDP | 65★ | — |
| Max Turbo Power | 182★ | — |
| Unlocked | ✗ | — |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | None | — |
| NPU TOPS | 3.5★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
BX80768265F
- Strong efficiency (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong single thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong multi thread (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong ai (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Below average affordability (26th percentile)
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
- Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong efficiency (67th percentile)
- Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average platform (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
Preise
BX80768265F0.299Score pro Dollar
vs
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF0.067Score pro Dollar
BX80768265F bietet 4.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: BX80768265F
Scores 90 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 18 of 29 specs.
