AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-core Socket TR4

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-core Socket TR4

AMD
78 Gesamtbewertung
vs
D&H BX80673I99980X

D&H BX80673I99980X

D&H
75 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Productivity
AMD
89
D&H
82
Server
AMD
80
D&H
66
Ai Llm
AMD
76
D&H
73
Efficiency
AMD
37
D&H
72
Gaming
AMD
51
D&H
70
Budget
AMD
42
D&H
66

Spezifikationen

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960XD&H BX80673I99980X
Processor
BrandAMDIntel
SeriesRyzen ThreadripperCore i9
Model3960X9980XE
Codename—Skylake X
Classhedtdesktop
Process7★14
Cores & Clocks
Cores24★18
Threads48★36
Base Clock
3,800
3,000
Boost Clock
4,500
4,400
Cache
L2 Cache1218★
L3 Cache
140
24.75
Performance
PassMark Multi
54,742
143,309
PassMark Single
2,681
4,547
Memory
Memory TypeDDR4DDR4
Max SpeedKeine Daten
2,666
Channels44
Platform & Power
SocketSocket TR4LGA2066
PCIe4.03.0
PCIe Lanes88★48
TDP280165★
Unlocked✓✓

Vor- & Nachteile

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-core Socket TR4

  • Strong ai (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong feature (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong multi thread (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average affordability (5th percentile)5th %ile

D&H BX80673I99980X

  • Strong multi thread (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong ai (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong single thread (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Below average affordability (8th percentile)8th %ile

Preise

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-core Socket TR4 is 657 $ cheaper (1.6x less).

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-core Socket TR40.071Score pro Dollar
vs
D&H BX80673I99980X0.043Score pro Dollar

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-core Socket TR4 bietet 1.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-core Socket TR4

D&H BX80673I99980X

Fazit

═ Gleichstand

Both products are closely matched - AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X wins 7 specs while D&H BX80673I99980X wins 5.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Besser bei:

Ai LlmServerProductivity

D&H BX80673I99980X Besser bei:

BudgetGamingEfficiency

Auch in Betracht ziehen