FLATIC CDR10
FLATIC
40 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Minolta MNF10Z-BK Standard Natural Vivid Monochrome High Contrast B&Amp;W Negative 2025
Minolta
50 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Product Photography
Youtube
Video
Beginner
Streaming
Photography
Vlogging
Wedding Events
Travel
Sports Wildlife
Spezifikationen
| FLATIC CDR10 | Minolta MNF10Z-BK | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | — | 1/2.3-inch |
| Megapixels | 64 MP | 72 MP★ |
| ISO Range | — | 100★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 6K★ | 5K |
| 4K FPS | — | 60 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 120 fps★ |
| Log Profile | ✓★ | — |
| Codec | MP4 | H.264, H.265 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3"★ | 2.8" |
| Touchscreen | — | ✓★ |
| Articulating | ✓ | ✓ |
| Build | ||
| Weight | — | 1.11 kg★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | — | ✗ |
| USB | Type-C | USB-C★ |
| HDMI | HDMI | HDMI-C |
| Hot Shoe | ✓ | ✓ |
Vor- & Nachteile
FLATIC CDR10
- Strong connectivity (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong video (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong sensor (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong social proof (77th percentile)
- Below average burst (32nd percentile)
- Below average stabilization (34th percentile)
Minolta MNF10Z-BK Standard Natural Vivid Monochrome High Contrast B&Amp;W Negative 2025
- Strong display (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong connectivity (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong video (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong sensor (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average burst (32nd percentile)
- Below average stabilization (34th percentile)
Preise
FLATIC CDR100.402Score pro Dollar
vs
Minolta MNF10Z-BK Standard Natural Vivid Monochrome High Contrast B&Amp;W Negative 20250.189Score pro Dollar
FLATIC CDR10 bietet 2.1x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Minolta MNF10Z-BK
Scores 50 overall, wins 9 of 10 usage categories and 7 of 18 specs.
