SJCAM C400
SJCAM
50 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon Zf Zf Silver 2023
Nikon
92 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Sports Wildlife
Beginner
Wedding Events
Video
Photography
Youtube
Product Photography
Travel
Streaming
Vlogging
Spezifikationen
| SJCAM C400 | Nikon Zf Zf | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | — | full-frame |
| Megapixels | — | 24.5 MP★ |
| ISO Range | — | 100★ |
| Processor | — | EXPEED 7 |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | Keine Daten | |
| AF Type | — | Photo, VideoContrast Detection, Phase Detection: 273 |
| Eye AF | — | ✓★ |
| Animal AF | — | ✓★ |
| Subject Detection | — | ✓★ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 14 fps★ |
| Burst (Electronic) | — | 30 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/8000 |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K FPS | — | 60 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 120 fps★ |
| 10-bit | — | ✓★ |
| Log Profile | ✓ | ✓ |
| RAW Video | — | ✗ |
| Codec | MP4 | H.265 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 2.3" | 3.2"★ |
| Touchscreen | ✓ | ✓ |
| Articulating | ✓ | ✓ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 3.7M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | — | 0.63 kg★ |
| Battery Life | — | 410 shots★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | ✓★ |
| USB | — | USB-C★ |
| HDMI | — | Micro-HDMI |
| Hot Shoe | — | ✓★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
SJCAM C400
- Strong display (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong build (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong stabilization (79th percentile)
- Strong social proof (77th percentile)
- Below average sensor (30th percentile)
- Below average burst (34th percentile)
Nikon Zf Zf Silver 2023
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong connectivity (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong battery (94th percentile)94th %ile
Preise
SJCAM C4000.261Score pro Dollar
vs
Nikon Zf Zf Silver 20230.053Score pro Dollar
SJCAM C400 bietet 4.9x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Nikon Zf Zf
Scores 92 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 19 of 33 specs.
