Kodak Charmera 1987

Kodak Charmera 1987

Kodak
17 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon Z Z9 Black 2021

Nikon Z Z9 Black 2021

Nikon
100 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Beginner
Kodak
17
Nikon
97
Video
Kodak
17
Nikon
95
Wedding Events
Kodak
12
Nikon
95
Sports Wildlife
Kodak
15
Nikon
94
Photography
Kodak
13
Nikon
91
Youtube
Kodak
11
Nikon
90
Product Photography
Kodak
8
Nikon
88
Travel
Kodak
11
Nikon
81
Streaming
Kodak
10
Nikon
78
Vlogging
Kodak
8
Nikon
76

Spezifikationen

Kodak Charmera 1987Nikon Z Z9
Sensor
TypeStacked CMOS
Sizefull-frame
Megapixels1.600000023841858 MP45.70000076293945 MP
ISO Range64
ProcessorEXPEED 7
Autofocus
AF PointsKeine Daten
493
AF TypePhase Detection: 493
Eye AF
Animal AF
Subject Detection
Shooting
Burst (Mechanical)30 fps
Burst (Electronic)120 fps
Max Shutter1/32000
Electronic Shutter
Video
Max Resolution1080p8K
4K FPS120 fps
1080p FPS100 fps
10-bit
Log Profile
RAW Video
CodecProRes 422 HQ, H.265
Display & EVF
Screen Size3.2"
Touchscreen
Articulating
EVF Resolution3.7M dots
Build
Weather Sealed
Weight1.16 kg
Battery Life700 shots
Connectivity
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
USBUSB-C
HDMIHDMI Output
Hot Shoe

Vor- & Nachteile

Kodak Charmera 1987

  • Below average sensor (0th percentile)0th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (22nd percentile)
  • Below average video (24th percentile)
  • Below average display (31st percentile)

Nikon Z Z9 Black 2021

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong video (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong battery (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile

Preise

Kodak Charmera 1987 is 4.105 $ cheaper (118.3x less).

Kodak Charmera 19870.494Score pro Dollar
vs
Nikon Z Z9 Black 20210.024Score pro Dollar

Kodak Charmera 1987 bietet 20.6x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon Z Z9

Scores 100 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 26 of 33 specs.

Nikon Z Z9 Besser bei:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography

Auch in Betracht ziehen