Kodak FZ55
Kodak
22 التقييم العام
مقابل
Panasonic LUMIX S S5 Black 2020
Panasonic
82 التقييم العام
التقييمات
Beginner
Video
Wedding Events
Sports Wildlife
Youtube
Photography
Product Photography
Streaming
Vlogging
Travel
المواصفات
| Kodak FZ55 | Panasonic LUMIX S S5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | — | CMOS |
| Size | — | full-frame |
| Megapixels | — | 24.200000762939453 MP★ |
| ISO Range | — | 100★ |
| Processor | — | Venus Engine |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | لا توجد بيانات | |
| AF Type | — | Contrast Detection: 225 |
| Eye AF | — | ✓★ |
| Animal AF | — | ✓★ |
| Subject Detection | — | ✓★ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 7 fps★ |
| Burst (Electronic) | — | 30 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/8000 |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 1080p | 4K★ |
| 4K FPS | — | 60 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 100 fps★ |
| 10-bit | — | ✓★ |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| RAW Video | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | — | H.264, H.265 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 3"★ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✓★ |
| Articulating | — | ✓★ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 2.4M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.63 kg★ |
| Battery Life | — | 440 shots★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | ✓★ |
| USB | — | USB-C 3.0 / 3.1/3.2 Gen 1★ |
| HDMI | — | Micro-HDMI |
| Hot Shoe | — | ✓★ |
الإيجابيات والسلبيات
Kodak FZ55
- Strong stabilization (75th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average video (23rd percentile)
- Below average display (28th percentile)
- Below average sensor (29th percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S5 Black 2020
- Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong connectivity (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong battery (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (29th percentile)
الأسعار
Kodak FZ550.124نقاط لكل دولار
مقابل
Panasonic LUMIX S S5 Black 20200.064نقاط لكل دولار
Kodak FZ55 يقدم قيمة أفضل بـ 1.9x مقابل المال
الحكم النهائي
الفائز: Panasonic LUMIX S S5
Scores 82 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 26 of 33 specs.
