Team Group NV5000 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Team Group
63 综合评分
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Seagate
91 综合评分
买家怎么说
Team Group NV5000 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
78 满分 100 置信度低 9 条评价
用户普遍对这款SSD感到满意，称赞其在游戏中的性能以及作为比廉价替代品更可靠的升级选择。提到的主要缺点是缺少散热片，尽管它仍被认为物有所值。总体而言，对于追求速度和可靠性的人来说，这是一个可靠的选择。
优点
- 出色的游戏性能
- 可靠的升级
- 物有所值
缺点
- 未附带散热片
Performance 3
Value for money 2
Reliability 2
Cooling 2
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
85 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价
这款SSD因其卓越的耐用性和高耐久性而备受赞誉，5年质保和救援服务让人安心。用户强调其超快的顺序读写速度，非常适合游戏和繁重工作负载。支持DirectStorage是现代游戏配置的一个加分项。然而，一些人指出并非所有电脑都能保证兼容，建议检查系统要求。
优点
- 5年质保
- 包含救援服务
- 高耐久性（5,050TBW）
- 快速顺序读写
- 支持DirectStorage
缺点
- 兼容性不保证
- 可能不适合所有电脑
Durability 1
Warranty 1
Performance 1
Compatibility 1
Directstorage support 1
评分
Laptop
Gaming
Console
Workstation
Budget
Portable
规格
| Team Group NV5000 | Seagate FireCuda 530R | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 4 | 4 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | SLC★ | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | ✗ |
| Controller | — | E18 |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | ||
| Warranty (years) | 3 | 5★ |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓★ | ✗ |
优缺点
Team Group NV5000 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong feature (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong endurance (70th percentile)
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong endurance (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile
结论
胜出: Seagate FireCuda 530R
Scores 91 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 17 specs.