Team Group 4TB SSD PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Team Group 4TB SSD PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Team Group
90 综合评分
vs
Kingston 4TB SSD PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 2280

Kingston 4TB SSD PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 2280

Kingston
97 综合评分

评分

Workstation
Team Group
81
Kingston
97
Gaming
Team Group
88
Kingston
97
Console
Team Group
87
Kingston
96
Laptop
Team Group
92
Kingston
83
Budget
Team Group
82
Kingston
83
Portable
Team Group
24
Kingston
25

规格

Team Group 4TB SSDKingston 4TB SSD
Drive
Capacity
4,000
4,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation44
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
7,400
7,300
Sequential Write (MB/s)
6,900
7,000
Random Read (IOPS)
650,000
1,000,000
Random Write (IOPS)
660,000
1,000,000
Hardware
NANDSLC★TLC
DRAM Cache✗✓★
ControllerMaxioPhison E18
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
2,000
4,000
MTBF (hours)
1,600,000
1,800,000
Warranty (years)35★
Features
Heatsink✗✓★
Hardware Encryption—✗

优缺点

Team Group 4TB SSD PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong speed (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong random (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average affordability (16th percentile)16th %ile

Kingston 4TB SSD PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong random (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong endurance (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Below average affordability (9th percentile)9th %ile

价格

Team Group 4TB SSD PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 is MX$8,090 cheaper (1.7x less).

Team Group 4TB SSD PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.008每美元得分
vs
Kingston 4TB SSD PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 22800.005每美元得分

Team Group 4TB SSD PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 性价比高 1.6 倍

Team Group 4TB SSD PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Kingston 4TB SSD PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 2280

结论

★ 胜出: Kingston 4TB SSD

Scores 97 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 18 specs.

Team Group 4TB SSD 更擅长:

Laptop

Kingston 4TB SSD 更擅长:

GamingConsoleWorkstation

也值得考虑