Team Group T-FORCE G50 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Team Group T-FORCE G50 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Team Group
74 综合评分
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate
91 综合评分

买家怎么说

Team Group T-FORCE G50 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

82 满分 100 置信度中 12 条评价

用户普遍赞赏这款SSD的实惠价格和扎实性能,认为非常适合日常使用和游戏。有人提到需要手动安装散热片和不必要的状态LED等小缺点,但总体满意度很高。

优点
  • 价格实惠
  • 读写速度快
  • 在NAS中运行良好
  • 安装简便
  • 性价比高
缺点
  • 手动安装散热片
  • 不必要的状态LED
  • 无DRAM控制器
👍 Value for money 4
👍 Performance 5
👍 Ease of installation 2
👎 Heatsink attachment 2
👎 Status led 1
👎 Dram controller 1

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

85 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价

这款SSD因其卓越的耐用性和高耐久性而备受赞誉,5年质保和救援服务让人安心。用户强调其超快的顺序读写速度,非常适合游戏和繁重工作负载。支持DirectStorage是现代游戏配置的一个加分项。然而,一些人指出并非所有电脑都能保证兼容,建议检查系统要求。

优点
  • 5年质保
  • 包含救援服务
  • 高耐久性(5,050TBW)
  • 快速顺序读写
  • 支持DirectStorage
缺点
  • 兼容性不保证
  • 可能不适合所有电脑
👍 Durability 1
👍 Warranty 1
👍 Performance 1
👎 Compatibility 1
👍 Directstorage support 1

评分

Laptop
Team Group
64
Seagate
90
Budget
Team Group
89
Seagate
73
Gaming
Team Group
70
Seagate
86
Console
Team Group
58
Seagate
83
Workstation
Team Group
67
Seagate
83
Portable
Team Group
19
Seagate
24

规格

Team Group T-FORCE G50Seagate FireCuda 530R
Drive
Capacity
1,000
4,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation44
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
5,000
7,400
Sequential Write (MB/s)
4,800
6,800
Random Read (IOPS)无数据
1,300,000
Random Write (IOPS)无数据
1,300,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✗
ControllerInnoGritE18
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
650
5,050
MTBF (hours)
3,000,000
1,800,000
Warranty (years)35★
Features
Heatsink✓★✗

优缺点

Team Group T-FORCE G50 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong endurance (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong feature (79th percentile)
  • Strong speed (75th percentile)

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong endurance (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile

结论

★ 胜出: Seagate FireCuda 530R

Scores 91 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 17 specs.

Team Group T-FORCE G50 更擅长:

Budget

Seagate FireCuda 530R 更擅长:

GamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation